Decree concerning re-vote on SO 2016-12
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
Decree concerning re-vote on SO 2016-12
By Us, Nassau-Windsor, Founder of The Parliamentary Union of Nations, as in Our role and capacity as the ultimate authority of Our Region, We do hereby order the Prime Minister to call a re-vote on Senate Order 2016-12 named "The Region's Administrative Branch [Constitutional Amendment]".
Nassau-Windsor
Nassau-Windsor
Nassau-Windsor- Admin
-
Posts : 342
Join date : 2016-02-27
Re: Decree concerning re-vote on SO 2016-12
even though the founder is the ultimate power, the PM is the head of gov. As said in the constitution "Subsection 1: However, he will maintain minimal interference in the Government and will obey the decisions of the Parliament and respect the actions of the other Executive Officials" which means the founder cannot legally force the PM To cast a re vote, since as in the consitution "Section D: The Prime Minister shall serve as the Head of Government for the Region"Nassau-Windsor wrote:By Us, Nassau-Windsor, Founder of The Parliamentary Union of Nations, as in Our role and capacity as the ultimate authority of Our Region, We do hereby order the Prime Minister to call a re-vote on Senate Order 2016-12 named "The Region's Administrative Branch [Constitutional Amendment]".
Nassau-Windsor
Hashkin-
Posts : 155
Join date : 2016-08-11
Re: Decree concerning re-vote on SO 2016-12
Your Excellences,
In my opinion, His Excellency The Minister of Jurisprudence did not explain the law as it should have been. The reasons why I think this are because of technical issues, which I will forward to you by these:
- The position of the Prime Minister
The position of the Prime Minister does not have any effect on the position of the Founder. While the Prime Minister may – and should – be Head of Government, that has nothing to do with the position of the Founder as the ‘ultimate authority’.
- Interference
In this case I ordered the Prime Minister to call for a re-vote on SO 2016-12. In the Constitution it is clearly stated that the Founder shall have minimal interference with the government, but minimal does not mean no interference. Also, it has been requested by the President that I would call for a re-vote (Second Stage Vote) on the RMB and this Forum several times. Thus, I did not decide/rule/request/order anything against the government’s initial plans or policies.
For the reasons stated above, I would like to hear the opinion from The Minister of Jurisprudence once again.
[Signed]
Nassau-Windsor
Senator and Founder
In my opinion, His Excellency The Minister of Jurisprudence did not explain the law as it should have been. The reasons why I think this are because of technical issues, which I will forward to you by these:
- The position of the Prime Minister
The position of the Prime Minister does not have any effect on the position of the Founder. While the Prime Minister may – and should – be Head of Government, that has nothing to do with the position of the Founder as the ‘ultimate authority’.
- Interference
In this case I ordered the Prime Minister to call for a re-vote on SO 2016-12. In the Constitution it is clearly stated that the Founder shall have minimal interference with the government, but minimal does not mean no interference. Also, it has been requested by the President that I would call for a re-vote (Second Stage Vote) on the RMB and this Forum several times. Thus, I did not decide/rule/request/order anything against the government’s initial plans or policies.
For the reasons stated above, I would like to hear the opinion from The Minister of Jurisprudence once again.
[Signed]
Nassau-Windsor
Senator and Founder
Nassau-Windsor- Admin
-
Posts : 342
Join date : 2016-02-27
Re: Decree concerning re-vote on SO 2016-12
For the record, I have never called for a re-vote. Basically, after an amendment passes the Legislature, it's supposed to go to referendum. I have called for you to host the referendum, not call a re-vote for the Legislature.
Libertarian Democracy-
Posts : 885
Join date : 2015-10-25
Similar topics
» FREEDOM OF VOTE ACT
» SO 2015-04 Freedom of Vote Act ENACTED
» President Nassau-Windsor Impeachment Vote
» SENATE ORDER 2015-4: FREEDOM OF VOTE ACT
» VOTING: SENATE ORDER 2015-4 TITLE: FREEDOM OF VOTE ACT
» SO 2015-04 Freedom of Vote Act ENACTED
» President Nassau-Windsor Impeachment Vote
» SENATE ORDER 2015-4: FREEDOM OF VOTE ACT
» VOTING: SENATE ORDER 2015-4 TITLE: FREEDOM OF VOTE ACT
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum