SO 2016-9, Constitutional amendment: Ending limitations on debate numbers Voting
5 posters
Page 1 of 1
SO 2016-9, Constitutional amendment: Ending limitations on debate numbers Voting
SO 2016-9: Constitutional amendment: Ending limitations on debate numbers
An Act to make an end to a specific, limited, number of Bills that can be reviewed or debated at the same time.
WHEREAS Our Constitution has regulated that Parliament can only review one Bill at any time;
WHEREAS We believe that Parliament has the ability to regulate their orders and procedures themselves;
WHEREAS We think that the quality of the debate on Bills is not influenced by the quantity of Bills being debated;
BELIEVING that by restricting Parliament to debate only a specific, limited, number of Bills at any time, the Executive Branch of government might influence the proceedings of the Legislative Branch;
FURTHER BELIEVING that by restricting Parliament to debate only a specific, limited, limited number of Bills at any time, the legislative process of Our Region slows down unnecessary;
GIVEN that at the moment of writing this Bill, the limited number of Bills that can be debated at any specific time is one (1) Bill;
BE IT ENACTED by the Minister of Development, by and with the advice and consent of Parliament and the Cabinet, in this present assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:-
Article 1
Section I of Article II from Our Constitution shall hereby be repealed.
Article 2
There will be added a new Section to Article II from Our Constitution that shall read as follows:-
"Parliament shall have the right to debate Bills at any time from the moment they are brought to the Debate Hall. There shall be no restrictions on the total number of Bills debated at any same time."
10th May 2016
Nassau-Windsor, Senator
Libertarian Democracy, Senator
Abdoa, Senator
Thrishca, Senator
CURRENT REPORT:
Voting: 4
Absent: 2
Majority: 6
In favour: 4
In opposition: 0
In abstention: 0
Result: PENDING
Last updated to May 20, 2016 at 1033
An Act to make an end to a specific, limited, number of Bills that can be reviewed or debated at the same time.
WHEREAS Our Constitution has regulated that Parliament can only review one Bill at any time;
WHEREAS We believe that Parliament has the ability to regulate their orders and procedures themselves;
WHEREAS We think that the quality of the debate on Bills is not influenced by the quantity of Bills being debated;
BELIEVING that by restricting Parliament to debate only a specific, limited, number of Bills at any time, the Executive Branch of government might influence the proceedings of the Legislative Branch;
FURTHER BELIEVING that by restricting Parliament to debate only a specific, limited, limited number of Bills at any time, the legislative process of Our Region slows down unnecessary;
GIVEN that at the moment of writing this Bill, the limited number of Bills that can be debated at any specific time is one (1) Bill;
BE IT ENACTED by the Minister of Development, by and with the advice and consent of Parliament and the Cabinet, in this present assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:-
Article 1
Section I of Article II from Our Constitution shall hereby be repealed.
Article 2
There will be added a new Section to Article II from Our Constitution that shall read as follows:-
"Parliament shall have the right to debate Bills at any time from the moment they are brought to the Debate Hall. There shall be no restrictions on the total number of Bills debated at any same time."
10th May 2016
Nassau-Windsor, Senator
Libertarian Democracy, Senator
Abdoa, Senator
Thrishca, Senator
CURRENT REPORT:
Voting: 4
Absent: 2
Majority: 6
In favour: 4
In opposition: 0
In abstention: 0
Result: PENDING
Last updated to May 20, 2016 at 1033
Last edited by Abdoa on Fri May 20, 2016 6:33 pm; edited 3 times in total
Re: SO 2016-9, Constitutional amendment: Ending limitations on debate numbers Voting
Voting will be open for four days until Monday May 23, 2016. PLEASE VOTE!!!!!!
Re: SO 2016-9, Constitutional amendment: Ending limitations on debate numbers Voting
Thrishca votes in favor
Thrishca- Posts : 25
Join date : 2015-12-31
Re: SO 2016-9, Constitutional amendment: Ending limitations on debate numbers Voting
Abdoa votes in favour.
Raeyser- Posts : 15
Join date : 2016-02-29
Re: SO 2016-9, Constitutional amendment: Ending limitations on debate numbers Voting
Nassau-Windsor votes in favour of this Bill. (Duh)
Nassau-Windsor- Admin
-
Posts : 342
Join date : 2016-02-27
Libertarian Democracy-
Posts : 885
Join date : 2015-10-25
Re: SO 2016-9, Constitutional amendment: Ending limitations on debate numbers Voting
Bostler has contacted me about a problem with their account, and told me to count his vote as an aye.
Re: SO 2016-9, Constitutional amendment: Ending limitations on debate numbers Voting
All the Senators have voted and the results as follows:
Voting: 6
Absent: 0
Majority: 6
In favour: 6
In opposition: 0
In abstention: 0
Result: PASSED
The will be sent to the President in a few hours, when I get to a computer.
Voting: 6
Absent: 0
Majority: 6
In favour: 6
In opposition: 0
In abstention: 0
Result: PASSED
The will be sent to the President in a few hours, when I get to a computer.
Re: SO 2016-9, Constitutional amendment: Ending limitations on debate numbers Voting
For transparency's sake you should probably post a screenshot.Abdoa wrote:Bostler has contacted me about a problem with their account, and told me to count his vote as an aye.
Libertarian Democracy-
Posts : 885
Join date : 2015-10-25
Re: SO 2016-9, Constitutional amendment: Ending limitations on debate numbers Voting
LibDem EDIT: Edited to protect Abdoa's privacy
TG reads, "Something is wrong with my forum account. So I figured I would TG this. I vote in favor of the amendment.
Libertarian Democracy-
Posts : 885
Join date : 2015-10-25
Similar topics
» SO 2016-9 Constitutional amendment: Ending limitations on debate numbers
» SO 2016-09 Ending Limitations on Debate Numbers (Constitutional Amendment)
» SO 2017-89 Amendment of the First Extraordinary Constitutional Convention [Constitutional Amendment] *VOTING*
» SO 2015-9, First Constitutional Amendment - Reducing Constitutional Ambiguity Voting Amendments
» SO 2015-11 First Constitutional Amendment Voting
» SO 2016-09 Ending Limitations on Debate Numbers (Constitutional Amendment)
» SO 2017-89 Amendment of the First Extraordinary Constitutional Convention [Constitutional Amendment] *VOTING*
» SO 2015-9, First Constitutional Amendment - Reducing Constitutional Ambiguity Voting Amendments
» SO 2015-11 First Constitutional Amendment Voting
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum